| Pages: [1] 2 |
1. WTF DID TO THA DRAKE!!! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
ElQuirko wrote: I wish everyone put their cases across like this guy... SYRIA CRISIS NOT WAR BAD GOOD NO INVADE K SARIN MURDOCH EMPIRE RUPERT PHONE TAPPING GOODBAD YESNO ARGENTINA WENT SPAIN BACK THIS NOT WORK NO NO NO rofl. this man sum...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2013.09.03 09:25:00
|
2. Eve Valkyrie - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I would prefer if they would focus all their efforts on EVE. Still buttloads of work to do here...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2013.08.20 18:37:00
|
3. Sticky:Singularity: Requests for account reactivation - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Please reactivate Lubomir Sakato. Thx in advance!
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2013.08.16 07:37:00
|
4. Mining ship risk reward balance - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
This is a fit I posted in the same subforum just a few posts away from this thread: [Hulk, tanked] Mining Laser Upgrade II Damage Control II Small Shield Extender II Adaptive Invulnerability Field II Limited Adaptive Invulnerability Field I ML-3...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.30 19:02:00
|
5. Exhumers need a serious buff. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
@ Joe Risalo Please recheck the fit I posted, it has 1x LMUII + 1xDCUII in the lows, so no lieing on my part here! Your point of cost effectiveness of a gank misses one important point. The price of the hull is irrelevant, it doesn-¦t drop;) Su...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.30 18:38:00
|
6. Exhumers need a serious buff. - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
Miss Whippy wrote: Gizznitt Malikite wrote: This is a properly tanked hulk: [Hulk, Current] Micro Auxiliary Power Core II Damage Control II Invulnerability Field II Medium Shield Extender II Invulnerability Field II Additional Thermal Ba...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.30 16:45:00
|
7. Hulks - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
Immortis Vexx, I see your point. But as far as I see one has to give up the Cargo-capacity on a Hulk to tank it or a combination of Cargo and 1 MLU. I would not say it-¦s sacrificing to give up 6,7% yield. It sounds like a fair tradeoff to me. Th...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 23:14:00
|
8. Hulks - in Ships and Modules [original thread]
I-¦m very surprised by the ignorance some miners show when it comes to this never ending Hulks/Suicideganking threadnaughts. Even after the very well laid out, highly detailed and factual argumentations provided by Petrus, Arazel and FTDiomedes p...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 22:12:00
|
9. Remove gas and dust - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
I-¦m a bit surprised about the fps-problems some people have with these clouds. Ok, i don-¦t know how it would be in anomalys, I just know these clouds from (lvl4) missions. There i don-¦t have any framerate problems, even more surprising as I ru...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 20:01:00
|
10. T3 Destroyers in Inferno?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Nariya Kentaya wrote: Jayrendo Karr wrote: I despide Tech 3 cruisers and what they stand for. The tengu/loki/proteus all need nerfs, tbh the Legion is what tech 3's should be. Adaptable to an extent but against a ship fit for the same role i...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 17:55:00
|
11. T3 Destroyers in Inferno?!? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
There are some things to note in this context. 1. atm there is absolutely no need for a tech3 destroyer when not even tier2 destroyers exist. First things first... 2. CCP dedicated themselves to remove the whole "tier"-concept and want to start ...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 17:50:00
|
12. Sticky:Combat frigate changes for Inferno - in Player Features and Ideas Discussion [original thread]
After heaving read the OP and all 11 pages I really get a very uncomfortabe feeling in my stomach. I highly aprechiate the whole "tiericide-" and rebalancing-efforts that were anounced and brought to us at Fanfest and in the corresponding devblog...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 17:18:00
|
13. Highsec mining capitals and Hulkageddon: GAMEBREAKING! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
0,5/10 Very poor try. Maybe go for another one?
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.29 11:46:00
|
14. INFERNO The escalation "of disconnects" Begins - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
No.
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2012.04.28 04:13:00
|
15. EVE Online: Dominion 1.1 Feedback Thread - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
everything looking ok here, no problems with autopatch. thx ccp
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2010.01.21 16:08:00
|
16. EVE-MEEP [3.0.0.0] Finally here! - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Great tool, thanks a lot for the big effort! Only thing I seem to have problems with: POS-fuel consumption seems to be way off. Do i need to set the POS-configurations somewhere? regards Lubomir
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2009.12.22 23:42:00
|
17. Walking in Station - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Southern Suzy No need for WIS, its a space SHIP internet game, wanna walk? buy dust when it gets released You are wrong. CCP wants EVE to be the "Ultimate SciFi-Simulator". Torfi and many others have stated this vision...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2009.12.09 01:47:00
|
18. API issues. c'mon CCP fess up! - in Issues, Workarounds & Localization [original thread]
Edited by: Lubomir Sakato on 09/12/2009 01:14:53 Edited by: Lubomir Sakato on 09/12/2009 01:09:42 There definately seems to be an issue with the API. I¦m missing approx 1.5-2Mil SP on 2 Characters (2 Accs) as reported by EveMon and EFT. ...
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2009.12.09 01:08:00
|
19. TQ is up - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
4 mins for download, no problems with patching. Good work ccp, thx a lot. regards
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2009.12.01 20:14:00
|
20. Have a good patch day, CCP =) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
yo, crossing fingers here;) regards Lubo
- by Lubomir Sakato - at 2009.12.01 01:39:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |